vigyasharma commented on code in PR #633:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/633#discussion_r867198860
##########
lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/tests/index/MockRandomMergePolicy.java:
##########
@@ -86,6 +86,20 @@ public MergeSpecification findMerges(
return mergeSpec;
}
+ @Override
+ public MergeSpecification findMerges(CodecReader... readers) throws
IOException {
+ if (random.nextBoolean() == true) {
+ return super.findMerges(readers);
+ } else {
+ // create a oneMerge for each reader to let them get concurrently
processed by addIndexes()
Review Comment:
Great! I can pilot this in a follow up PR for `TestAddIndexes`, and we could
incrementally move pieces as we touch them. Should we start a Jira to discuss
the naming convention? How about something like `testConcurrent*` e.g.
`testConcurrentAddIndexesWithRollback`?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
