[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10544?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17540309#comment-17540309
]
Greg Miller commented on LUCENE-10544:
--------------------------------------
As I understood Adrien's suggestion, I think the idea is to create a new
{{BulkScorer}} sub-class that would wrap another {{BulkScorer}} (provided as
{{in}} in Adrien's code snippet). This class would override the {{score}}
method as Adrien shows above to periodically check timeouts, but otherwise just
delegate to {{in}} if the query has not yet timed out. I image somewhere in
{{IndexSearcher}} you would instantiate this new "timeout enforcing bulk
scorer", wrapping the {{BulkScorer}} provided by the query's weight. Does that
help?
Also, can I request that we move this conversation over to
[LUCENE-10151|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10151]? This issue
is really about modifying {{ExitableTermsEnum}}, which we may want to
eventually due independent of adding timeout support to {{IndexSearcher}}.
Since this discussion is really about adding timeout support to
{{IndexSearcher}}, it would be best to capture the conversation in LUCENE-10151
to make it easier to dig up in the future. Thank you!
> Should ExitableTermsEnum wrap postings and impacts?
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-10544
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10544
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core/index
> Reporter: Greg Miller
> Priority: Major
>
> While looking into options for LUCENE-10151, I noticed that
> {{ExitableDirectoryReader}} doesn't actually do any timeout checking once you
> start iterating postings/impacts. It *does* create a {{ExitableTermsEnum}}
> wrapper when loading a {{{}TermsEnum{}}}, but that wrapper doesn't do
> anything to wrap postings or impacts. So timeouts will be enforced when
> moving to the "next" term, but not when iterating the postings/impacts
> associated with a term.
> I think we ought to wrap the postings/impacts as well with some form of
> timeout checking so timeouts can be enforced on long-running queries. I'm not
> sure why this wasn't done originally (back in 2014), but it was questioned
> back in 2020 on the original Jira SOLR-5986. Does anyone know of a good
> reason why we shouldn't enforce timeouts in this way?
> Related, we may also want to wrap things like {{seekExact}} and {{seekCeil}}
> given that only {{next}} is being wrapped currently.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
