[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17561189#comment-17561189
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10603:
----------------------------------------------------------

Commit 3e268805024cf98abb11f6de45b32403b088eb5b in lucene's branch 
refs/heads/branch_9x from Greg Miller
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene.git;h=3e268805024 ]

LUCENE-10603: Migrate remaining SSDV iteration to use docValueCount in 
production code (#1000)



> Improve iteration of ords for SortedSetDocValues
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-10603
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10603
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Lu Xugang
>            Assignee: Lu Xugang
>            Priority: Trivial
>          Time Spent: 3h 40m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> After SortedSetDocValues#docValueCount added since Lucene 9.2, should we 
> refactor the implementation of ords iterations using docValueCount instead of 
> NO_MORE_ORDS?
> Similar how SortedNumericDocValues did
> From 
> {code:java}
> for (long ord = values.nextOrd();ord != SortedSetDocValues.NO_MORE_ORDS; ord 
> = values.nextOrd()) {
> }{code}
> to
> {code:java}
> for (int i = 0; i < values.docValueCount(); i++) {
>   long ord = values.nextOrd();
> }{code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to