alessandrobenedetti commented on issue #11507: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/11507#issuecomment-1612704311
I am extremely curious, what should we consider a good performance to index <3M docs? I mean, I agree we should always try to improve things and aim for the stars, but as maintainers of a library who are we to decide what's acceptable and what's not for the users? Is it because of a comparison with other libraries or solutions? They may have many reasons for being faster (and definitely we should take inspiration) If we look to : https://home.apache.org/~mikemccand/lucenebench/indexing.html , we clearly improved the indexing throughput substantially over the years, does this mean that Lucene back in 2011 should have not committed additional features/improvements because for some people (people from the future) "it was slow"? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
