benwtrent commented on issue #12615: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12615#issuecomment-1747298348
> DiskANN is known to be slower at indexing than HNSW and the blog post does not compare single threaded index times with Lucene. @robertvanwinkle1138 this is just one of my concerns. Additionally, I think we would still have the "segment merging problem". I do think we can get HNSW merges down by keeping connections between graphs, I just haven't had cycles myself to dig into that. There is a Lucene issue around making HNSW merges faster somewhere... https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12440 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
