mikemccand commented on PR #888: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/888#issuecomment-1790470336
Oooh I missed this @uschindler -- it looks like a nice possible opto for the costly `BytesRefHash` methods, and it looks like (on the issue) you and @rmuir came to agreement on approach (this PR). I can benchmark this, but could you maybe modernize it to resolve the conflicts? Thanks! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
