msokolov commented on PR #15090:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/15090#issuecomment-3292278407

   > Are we cool with writing that stuff to metadata and loading? If so, I can 
make a chnage this week so we can see it in action and then go through the 
process of adding a new HNSW format that satisfies this.
   
   I think it's fine, thanks for volunteering. This should make extensibility, 
configuration, and so on easier. As this gets more complex I think we need it. 
It's not easy to find a one-size-fits-all setting; we know for example that 
different quantization settings are appropriate with different use cases and 
vector data varies a lot in its compressibility.  Unless we're willing to fully 
embed hyper-parameter optimization into Lucene (and we shouldn't, it's too much 
magic) I think we have to expose the complexity to users so they can choose. 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to