costin commented on PR #16623:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/16623#issuecomment-5515978435

   Forgot the benchmark
   ### CopyOfBenchmark
   
   AMD EPYC 7R32 (c5a.2xlarge), JDK 25, 3 forks, 5 iters x 3s.
   
   DenseLiveDocs:
   
   | deletionRate | size | before (us) | after (us) | ratio |
   |---|---|---:|---:|---:|
   | 0.1% | 100k | 53.1 | 0.97 | 54.7x |
   | 0.1% | 1M | 553.6 | 9.75 | 56.8x |
   | 1% | 100k | 65.0 | 0.98 | 66.3x |
   | 1% | 1M | 594.6 | 9.81 | 60.6x |
   | 10% | 100k | 128.3 | 0.98 | 130.9x |
   | 10% | 1M | 1249.3 | 9.95 | 125.6x |
   
   SparseLiveDocs:
   
   | deletionRate | size | before (us) | after (us) | ratio |
   |---|---|---:|---:|---:|
   | 0.1% | 100k | 93.6 | 1.74 | 53.8x |
   | 0.1% | 1M | 734.5 | 17.4 | 42.2x |
   | 1% | 100k | 119.6 | 7.19 | 16.6x |
   | 1% | 1M | 1187.7 | 79.7 | 14.9x |
   | 10% | 100k | 219.7 | 63.0 | 3.5x |
   | 10% | 1M | 2183.3 | 730.5 | 3.0x |
   
   Generic Bits fallback (unchanged):
   
   | deletionRate | size | before (us) | after (us) | ratio |
   |---|---|---:|---:|---:|
   | 0.1% | 100k | 59.9 | 60.1 | 1.00x |
   | 0.1% | 1M | 481.2 | 487.2 | 0.99x |
   | 1% | 100k | 68.3 | 68.5 | 1.00x |
   | 1% | 1M | 550.8 | 549.7 | 1.00x |
   | 10% | 100k | 130.5 | 131.5 | 0.99x |
   | 10% | 1M | 1215.5 | 1216.9 | 1.00x |
   
   ### SoftDeletesReaderBenchmark
   
   Same hardware setup.
   
   | softDeleteRate | numDocs | before (us) | after (us) | ratio |
   |---|---|---:|---:|---:|
   | 1% | 200k | 410 | 31 | 13.3x |
   | 5% | 200k | 457 | 81 | 5.7x |
   | 1% | 1M | 1959 | 146 | 13.4x |
   | 5% | 1M | 2241 | 400 | 5.6x |


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to