[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2174?page=comments#action_69944 ] 
            
Brett Porter commented on MNG-2174:
-----------------------------------

this needs to be checked from an inheritence perspective, but there's also a 
chance that it's just a victim of the bug where only plugin dependencies from 
the first POM activating the plugin are taken (which is a more complicated fix 
as it pertains to how the plugin classloader is constructed).

In both cases, the workaround is to put the plugins with dependencies in the 
root POM.


> <pluginManagement><plugins><plugin><dependencies> do not propogate to child 
> POM plugins (potentially scoped to only affecting child POM plugins that live 
> within a <profile>)
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MNG-2174
>                 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2174
>             Project: Maven 2
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: John Allen
>             Fix For: 2.0.5
>
>
> <pluginManagement><plugins><plugin><dependencies> do not propogate to child 
> POM plugins.
> Kenny believe this works OKAY if the childs are using the parent 
> <pluginManagement> preconfigured plugins in their main <build> section 
> however it does NOT work if the childs are trying to use those preconfigured 
> plugins via their own <profiles>. Configuration propogates through okay but 
> dependencies are missing and have to be respecified in the child POMs.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to