[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2546?page=comments#action_74190 ] 
            
Binyan commented on MNG-2546:
-----------------------------

This is really an implementation of the composite pattern IMO and we should 
flip the architecture.  We need to have a default lifecycle the same as it 
exists today.  However the new default lifecycle should have the pre and post 
reactor phases you wrote about in the email.  Then the DefaultMaven class would 
invoke the LifecycleExecutor implementation, which would execute the specified 
lifecycle (or new default if one wasn't specified) and the reactor should be 
bound to a phase in the new default like any other plugin.  I think there 
should be a top level element in the pom to indicate the lifecycle to use too.


> Allow plugin executions in the "super-init" phase before reactor sorting of 
> modules build order
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MNG-2546
>                 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2546
>             Project: Maven 2
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Reactor and workspace
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.4
>            Reporter: Binyan
>         Attachments: MNG-2546-maven-core.patch
>
>
> As seen here, 
> http://www.nabble.com/How-to-execute-a-plugin-prior-to-the-reactor-sorting--tf2062739.html#a5682349.
>   I also have the need to bind my maven-pde-plugin to a phase before the 
> reactor sorting of project build order happens.  My plugin is being developed 
> to build eclipse plugins, features, fragments, update sites and products.  
> Right now I can build plugins and features.  However the order has to 
> constantly be managed by the user taking information from the eclipse 
> descriptors and adding it to the pom file.  For plugin projects I can bind to 
> a phase before the compile phase and dynamically analyze the eclipse plugin 
> descriptors and add the necessary dependencies/resources to the MavenProject 
> instance and all is well.  For feature projects, I also can dynamically 
> analyze the eclipse feature descriptor and add the necessary resources to the 
> MavenProject instance.  However, features depend on other plugins, fragments 
> and features.  While I can dynamicaly add the plugins, fragments and features 
> to the MavenProject as dependencies they are not taken into context as the 
> reactor has already computed the sorting order.
> What would be perfect is if there was a "super-init" phase that plugins could 
> bind to and be executed in before the normal declared lifecycle happened.  
> Therefore no matter what the lifecycle was, the "super-init" phase would be 
> available.  Then plugins could do things like augmenting the super-pom with 
> build #'s/identifiers, dependencies, dynamic projects, etc all before maven 
> gets going.  That would solve the problem myself and others have as well as 
> be 100% backwards compatible.  This super-init phase (please pick a better 
> name) would e available to reactor and non-reactor builds.  A more specific 
> fix would be to allow plugins to ask the reactor to reevaluate the build 
> order.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


Reply via email to