[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-5971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15158980#comment-15158980
 ] 

Stephane Nicoll commented on MNG-5971:
--------------------------------------

I will update and re-test but just to answer your question, yes we do rely on 
the order of declaration. That's the only way that I know of to manage a 
conflict. If several BOMs are working on a set of common dependencies you have 
to tell which one wins and ordering the boms (first win strategy) is something 
we do for _a very long time_

Practically speaking it also makes sense: you can't possibly ask 4 different 
projects to not have _any_ conflicting library at all.


> Imported dependencies should be available to inheritance processing
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MNG-5971
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-5971
>             Project: Maven
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Dependencies
>    Affects Versions: 3.3.3
>            Reporter: Stephane Nicoll
>            Assignee: Christian Schulte
>            Priority: Trivial
>              Labels: close-pending
>             Fix For: 3.4.0
>
>         Attachments: bom-cloud.zip
>
>
> When a project extends from a parent with a {{dependencyManagement}} section, 
> it is not always possible to properly override (and align) the version to use 
> for a group of dependencies.
> We typically use Bill Of Materials to gather a group of modules and make sure 
> their versions are consistent. 
> The following project demonstrates the issue: 
> https://github.com/snicoll-scratches/maven-dependency-management
> The first commit is a working use case where the parent uses a bom with 
> version A and we use the same bom with version B in the child. Version B is 
> used as expected.
> The second commit demonstrates the faulty scenario. Rather than using a bom 
> in the parent, we use a direct dependency (provided by that bom). We still 
> use the bom with a different version. In that case all the dependencies but 
> the one provided by the parent are overridden (leading to mixed versions for 
> the dependencies provided by the BOM).
> It looks like the distance is still used to compute the version while the 
> graph of dependencies should be flatten at each step for a proper override. 
> Thoughts? Thanks!



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to