[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHARED-494?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15356982#comment-15356982
]
Daniel Wegener edited comment on MSHARED-494 at 6/30/16 12:20 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------------
Sounds great! Did a first step just into that direction today :)
https://github.com/codehaus-plexus/plexus-archiver/issues/48
Feel free to jump in if you want.
I am still a bit concerned about the file ordering within the zip file - the
order in which files in a directory are iterated depends on the OS/FileSystem -
so there might be still some steps to go. But I'd feel much better if two
builds on the same machine/environment would at least produce the same output.
was (Author: dwegener):
Sounds great! Did a first step just into that direction today :)
https://github.com/codehaus-plexus/plexus-archiver/issues/48
> Impossible to generate a reproducible build due to timestamp in pom.properties
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MSHARED-494
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHARED-494
> Project: Maven Shared Components
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: maven-archiver
> Affects Versions: maven-archiver-3.0.0
> Reporter: Emanuele Tagliaferri
> Assignee: Michael Osipov
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: maven-archiver-3.1.0
>
>
> Try to making a pom for do a reproducible build, meaning by reproducible
> build the ability to produce the exact same artifact (same checksum) starting
> from the same code, a two different times, i had some trouble with the files
> generated in: /META-INF/maven/groupId/artifactId/
> in the specific the /META-INF/maven/groupId/artifactId/pom.properties
> contains the timestamp.
> digging in the code in the class:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/shared/tags/maven-archiver-3.0.0/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/archiver/PomPropertiesUtil.java?revision=1708674&view=markup
> line 86
> is used the java.util.Properties#store which write the timestamp in any case.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)