JDM created MWAR-395:
------------------------

             Summary: REGRESSION: Conflict with Workspace Resolution in Eclipse
                 Key: MWAR-395
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MWAR-395
             Project: Maven WAR Plugin
          Issue Type: Bug
    Affects Versions: 2.6, 2.5, 2.4
         Environment: Eclipse Mars (4.5.2)
Eclipse m2e 1.6.2
            Reporter: JDM


MWAR-192 first introduced this issue. When executing a Maven WAR build through 
Eclipse, it allows resolution of other projects within the workspace via 
"Resolve Workspace artifacts" in the run configuration. This replaces the 
project dependencies that would normally be JARs with the {{target/classes}} 
directories for the projects.

Here's a sample verbose output from the compiler plugin which shows this 
replacement, where "WarProject" is the WAR project and "JarProject" is a JAR 
project:

{code}
[DEBUG] Classpath: [~/WarProject/target/classes
 ~/JarProject/target/classes
 
~/.m2/repository/javax/servlet/javax.servlet-api/3.0.1/javax.servlet-api-3.0.1.jar]
{code}

This was corrected with a patch merged in revision 
[1492158|https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/changelog/maven?cs=1492158]. 
Unfortunately, this fix was then regressed 18 days later by revision 
[1498124|https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/changelog/maven?cs=1498124] for issue 
MWAR-128.

Previous to the second commit, the {{target/classes}} directory would be passed 
to {{AbstractWarPackagingTask.copyFile}} by 
{{ArtifactsPackagingTask.performPackaging}}. It would then be registered and 
passed to the second overload of {{AbstractWarPackagingTask.copyFile}}, where 
the directory would then be bundled into a JAR.

After the second commit, any directory passed to that first {{copyFile}} will 
simply result in an empty directory with the target name being created. This is 
exactly the result I see after packaging the WAR:

{code}
WarProject-1.0.0.war
|> WEB-INF/
   |> lib/
      |> JarProject-1.0.0.jar/
      |> javax.servlet-api-3.0.1.jar
{code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to