[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MCHECKSTYLE-229?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Michael Osipov closed MCHECKSTYLE-229.
--------------------------------------
    Resolution: Auto Closed

This issue has been auto closed because it has been inactive for a long period 
of time. If you think this issue still applies, retest your problem with the 
most recent version of Maven and the affected component, reopen and post your 
results.

> Enable logging of non-violations
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MCHECKSTYLE-229
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MCHECKSTYLE-229
>             Project: Maven Checkstyle Plugin
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: checkstyle:check
>    Affects Versions: 2.12.1
>            Reporter: Andreas Sewe
>            Priority: Major
>
> MCHECKSTYLE-182 is now addressed in 2.12 and produces nice-looking outputs on 
> the console. :-)
> Alas, {{logViolationsToConsole}} only does so if the output in question is 
> indeed a violation, i.e., something that you normally would like to fail the 
> build ({{failOnViolation}} is true by default). This is typically not the 
> case for things that Checkstyle considers warnings ({{violationSeverity}} 
> defaults to {{error}}).
> As far as I can see, there is no way to configure the 
> {{maven-checkstyle-plugin}} to log things that are not considered violations 
> ({{consoleOutput}} only prints meaningless "Starting audit" messages, so that 
> parameter doesn't offer a workaround).
> As far as I can see, a more flexible way would be to have the following three 
> properties:
> * {{failOnViolation}}
> * {{violationSeverity}} (one of {{error}}, {{warning}}, {{info}})
> * {{logSeverity}} (one of {{error}}, {{warning}}, {{info}}, {{none}})
> This would allow one to drop {{logViolationsToConsole}} (can be emulated by 
> setting {{logSeverity}} equal to or lower than {{violationSeverity}}) while 
> at the same time enabling the logging of, e.g., non-violation warnings.
> What do you think?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to