[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16426617#comment-16426617
]
Michael Osipov commented on MNG-6387:
-------------------------------------
I am thinking wether it should be {{application/pom+xml}} or rather
{{application/maven-pom+xml}} because just {{pom}} says nothing to the outside
world. Can you raise this on the dev@? I'd like to hear other opinions.
> Pom files should have a dedicated mime type registered ("application/pom+xml"
> or similar)
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MNG-6387
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6387
> Project: Maven
> Issue Type: Wish
> Components: POM
> Reporter: Alex Dubov
> Priority: Trivial
>
> For the sake of convenience working with ever growing abundance of packages,
> and, thus, pom files, is not it time to give the humble pom file its own,
> dedicated mime type (something to the tune of "application/pom+xml")?
> Presently, the fact that pom files don't have a dedicated mime type causes
> all kinds of minor but annoying issues in all kinds of least expected places.
> Considering that registering a mime type with IANA is a pretty
> straightforward process and that pom files are widely used for all kinds of
> automation purposes (and not exclusively by maven anymore), I, on behalf of
> the wider community, urge you to consider registering a dedicated pom mime
> type.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
