[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16484595#comment-16484595
 ] 

Robert Scholte commented on MNG-6415:
-------------------------------------

With Maven the dependency resolution defines the order, there's no such thing 
as wildcards, the order is always predictable. Depending on the way the 
application is created it is possible to respect the order. With MNG-6025 that 
order changed. 
I do understand the claim from Thomas, especially when referring to a directory 
instead of explicit jars, if you know that 
[File.html#listFiles()|https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/io/File.html#listFiles()]
 says 
{quote}There is no guarantee that the name strings in the resulting array will 
appear in any specific order; they are not, in particular, guaranteed to appear 
in alphabetical order.{quote}
Maven is a different story, it should not change the order if applications 
relies on that (on purpose and on their own risk). Otherwise we should add an 
option to randomize the order of the classpath.

> Project Artifacts Cache does not retain the order of classpath entries.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MNG-6415
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6415
>             Project: Maven
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core
>    Affects Versions: 3.5.2
>         Environment: Windows 7, JDK8u144
>            Reporter: Seckin Onur SELAMET
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: CLASSPATH
>         Attachments: 
> [MNG-6415]_Fixes_Project_Artifact_Cache_classpath_order_retaining_issue_.patch
>
>
> Project artifacts cache does not retain the order of classpath entries.
> Wrong Object type used in implementation. HashSet can not guarantee the order 
> of elements.
> In runtime ProjectArtifacts passed as LinkedHashSet already which is safe.
>  
> Possible fix is provided in comments section.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to