[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Roberto Benedetti updated MJAVADOC-527:
---------------------------------------
    Description: 
The url of artifact com.sun.mail:mailapi:1.5.5 is 
[http://javamail.java.net/mailapi], so the plugin tests if 
[http://javamail.java.net/mailapi/apidocs/package-list] is valid.
 That url redirects to [https://javaee.github.io/javamail/] which is JavaMail 
home page, so the plugin thinks the url is valid and passes it to javadoc.
 javadoc warns about invalid link.

Maybe checking if the effective url is still "package-list" would be safer.

  was:
The url of artifact com.sun.mail:mailapi:1.5.5 is 
http://javamail.java.net/mailapi, so the plugin tests if 
http://javamail.java.net/mailapi/apidocs/package-list is valid.
That url redirects to https://javaee.github.io/javamail/ which is JavaMail home 
page, so the plugin thinks the url is valid and passes it to javadoc.
javadoc warns about wrong link.

Maybe checking if the effective url is still "package-list" would be safer.


> detectLinks may pass invalid urls to javadoc
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MJAVADOC-527
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-527
>             Project: Maven Javadoc Plugin
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: javadoc
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.1
>         Environment: Windows 10
> JDK 8
> Maven 3.5.2
>            Reporter: Roberto Benedetti
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: detectLinks
>
> The url of artifact com.sun.mail:mailapi:1.5.5 is 
> [http://javamail.java.net/mailapi], so the plugin tests if 
> [http://javamail.java.net/mailapi/apidocs/package-list] is valid.
>  That url redirects to [https://javaee.github.io/javamail/] which is JavaMail 
> home page, so the plugin thinks the url is valid and passes it to javadoc.
>  javadoc warns about invalid link.
> Maybe checking if the effective url is still "package-list" would be safer.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to