[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJLINK-28?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16612478#comment-16612478
]
Hudson commented on MJLINK-28:
------------------------------
Build succeeded in Jenkins: Maven TLP » maven-jlink-plugin » master #32
See
https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-box/job/maven-jlink-plugin/job/master/32/
> Add WARNING in case of duplicate module names
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MJLINK-28
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJLINK-28
> Project: Maven JLink Plugin
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha-1
> Reporter: Karl Heinz Marbaise
> Assignee: Karl Heinz Marbaise
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha-2
>
>
> Technically you can have [duplicate module names|MJLINK-27] which should be
> bound together into a runtime image. But my opinion is: In such case there is
> something wrong (something similar to same artifactId within the same
> groupId). That's the reason we should generate a WARNING for such situations.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
