[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16615447#comment-16615447
]
Tibor Digana commented on SUREFIRE-1553:
----------------------------------------
[[email protected]]
The Vintage must be activated always according to user's POM. Am I right?
Why there is report file {{TEST-JUnit Vintage.xml}} and not
{{TEST-CalculatorTest.xml}}?
> @Unroll forces usage of JUnit Vintage
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: SUREFIRE-1553
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1553
> Project: Maven Surefire
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: JUnit 5.x support, Maven Surefire Plugin
> Affects Versions: 2.22.0
> Reporter: Sergey Skryabin
> Priority: Major
>
> If run
> {code}mvn clean test{code}
> JUnit4 tests and Spock tests (which not contain @Unroll) are executed
> normally. Once Spock test with @Unroll annotation appears, then Surefire
> execute
> {code}[INFO] Running JUnit Vintage{code}
> and all other JUnit4 tests and Spock tests are wrapped with this runner.
> In surefire-reports I see _TEST-<all tests executed before meeting
> @Unroll>.xml_ s and than
> _TEST-JUnit Vintage.xml_
> Though it could be done by intention, behaviour is different from 2.21.0 (no
> wrapping with Vintage). Also it much more visible to have separate reports
> per test class (both in console output and surefire-reports folder).
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
