[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSITE-837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16849876#comment-16849876
]
Damien Burke commented on MSITE-837:
------------------------------------
[~hboutemy] I only did a quick bit of research on what container to use. As per
my approach above, I just wanted to pick / implement an arbitrary server
initially, just to understand the scope of work, etc. That said, it would be
great if u could suggest a better alternative! I have made some progress with
undertow, but have a few blockers that are becoming troublesome and would be
happy to pivot!
> use an embedded http server that is light and requires just Java 7
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MSITE-837
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSITE-837
> Project: Maven Site Plugin
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: site:run
> Affects Versions: 3.8
> Reporter: Hervé Boutemy
> Priority: Major
> Labels: up-for-grabs
> Fix For: 3.8
>
>
> with Jetty upgrade for security reasons in MSITE-829 (even if security
> reasons could be discussed in "mvn site:run" scenario: we're not in a
> permanent webserver, just a developer temporary one that should be limited to
> localhost requests handling), Java 8 is required when our target currently is
> Java 7
> this is perhaps the right moment to look for a light http server that would
> not require Java 8: there are many options available like
> https://syntaxcorrect.com/Java/5_Ultra_Lightweight_Http_Server_Implementations_in_Java_for_Blazing_Fast_Microservices_APIs_or_Even_Websites
> or any other idea
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
