[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16861406#comment-16861406 ]
Vladimir Sitnikov commented on MNG-6677: ---------------------------------------- [~michael-o], I have tried to search for the request, and I fail to find one. I see similar issues like https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-251 and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MPIR-382 Did you have something else in mind? The fun fact is I came from https://github.com/spdx/tools/issues/192 "Support normalization of license names" (which is very close to MPIR-382), however for now it looks like the idea of trying to use "standard ID/URL" in <license> tag won't fly. That is why I wonder if a dedicated machine-readable field could appear. Note: I know that 4.0.0 is here "for ages". > Ability to declare machine-readable license identifier for project > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: MNG-6677 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6677 > Project: Maven > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: POM > Affects Versions: 3.6.1 > Reporter: Vladimir Sitnikov > Priority: Major > > Current model for license is something, yet it is not machine-friendly. > Developers tend to put random data into > {{<license><name>...</name><url>...</url>}}, and it is hard to analyze in > automatic way. > What if we could use SPDX license identifiers/expressions for license > information? > Note: currently POM allows to list multiple <license> tags, and it is not > clear how they should be treated (and? or?). So a machine-readable field > should probably allow for AND/OR license expressions. > So it would be nice if there was a way to declare a machine-readable license > tag. > I'm not affiliated with SPDX, however OSGi use those ids: > https://osgi.org/specification/osgi.core/7.0.0/framework.module.html#framework.module-bundle-license -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)