[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17150484#comment-17150484
]
Rainer Reich commented on MRESOLVER-123:
----------------------------------------
I did some tests with {{-Daether.checksums.algorithms=SHA-1}} and without
takari and executed a lot of builds without any problems. (y)
Are you still interested in a log of a successful run?
We would definitely be very happy to see this fix in the next Maven version.
Regarding Nexus compatibility, I don't know if we find out where the wrong
checksums came from but we might not be the only ones with problems like these,
so I hope the checksum option is going to get documented and officially
supported.
> Concurrency issues
> ------------------
>
> Key: MRESOLVER-123
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-123
> Project: Maven Resolver
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: resolver
> Affects Versions: 1.4.2
> Reporter: Michael Osipov
> Priority: Critical
> Attachments: checksum-error-debug.log
>
>
> This is an umbrella ticket for a long standing issue with Maven Resolver: Our
> concurrency support is mediocre in a way that if two or more threads try to
> download the same file and fail to queue those write actions nicely. The
> problem is that The {{SyncContext}} and the its factory provided by Maven
> Resolver does not employ any locking at all. As layed out in detail in
> MRESOLVER-114 we need striped read write locks on artifacts and its metadata.
> This issue shall track progress on it. Even Takari Concurrent Repository
> extension does not help because it is only intended to synchronize concurrent
> access by multple JVMs and not threads.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
