[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17153424#comment-17153424
 ] 

Rainer Reich commented on MRESOLVER-123:
----------------------------------------

The command prints only 25 groupIds where 22 are our own.
The other ones seem to be some plugin groups: com.google.code.sortpom, 
com.google.errorprone, org.apache.maven.plugins
It doesn't contain thirdparty libs which are of course relevant for artifact 
resolution / download, so I'm not sure if this is really what you're looking 
for.

> Provide a global locking sync context
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MRESOLVER-123
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-123
>             Project: Maven Resolver
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: resolver
>    Affects Versions: 1.4.2
>            Reporter: Michael Osipov
>            Assignee: Michael Osipov
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: checksum-error-debug.log, mvn-debug-1.4.3-123.txt, 
> mvn-debug-1.4.3-123.txt.gz
>
>
> This is an umbrella ticket for a long standing issue with Maven Resolver: Our 
> concurrency support is mediocre in a way that if two or more threads try to 
> download the same file and fail to queue those write actions nicely. The 
> problem is that The {{SyncContext}} and the its factory provided by Maven 
> Resolver does not employ any locking at all. As layed out in detail in 
> MRESOLVER-114 we need striped read write locks on artifacts and its metadata. 
> This issue shall track progress on it. Even Takari Concurrent Repository 
> extension does not help because it is only intended to synchronize concurrent 
> access by multple JVMs and not threads.
> This improvement will provide solely a global locking sync context which will 
> work in *single* JVM. It is a non-goal to make it work with mulitple JVMs. A 
> downside of this solution is that is coarse, possible degregation of 
> performance for the sake of stability.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to