[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17170991#comment-17170991
 ] 

Michael Osipov commented on MRESOLVER-123:
------------------------------------------

I agree that people simply did not understand the problem. The PR has been 
merged manually and closed. All changes are in master and tagged as 1.5.0. 
Unfortunately, I started the vote, but no one voted for 1.5.0 and did started 
additional discussions on the PR: 
[http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-dev/202007.mbox/%3C0f5c4620-b3da-0d73-9a87-e054672fa6ca%40apache.org%3E]

For now, I cannot tell whether Maven 3.7.0 will include 1.5.0+. If you like, 
raise a discussion on dev@.

> Provide a global locking sync context by default
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MRESOLVER-123
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-123
>             Project: Maven Resolver
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: resolver
>    Affects Versions: 1.4.2
>            Reporter: Michael Osipov
>            Assignee: Michael Osipov
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 1.5.0
>
>         Attachments: checksum-error-debug.log, mvn-debug-1.4.3-123.txt.gz
>
>
> This is an umbrella ticket for a long standing issue with Maven Resolver: Our 
> concurrency support is mediocre in a way that if two or more threads try to 
> download the same file and fail to queue those write actions nicely. The 
> problem is that The {{SyncContext}} and the its factory provided by Maven 
> Resolver does not employ any locking at all. As layed out in detail in 
> MRESOLVER-114 we need striped read write locks on artifacts and its metadata. 
> This issue shall track progress on it. Even Takari Concurrent Repository 
> extension does not help because it is only intended to synchronize concurrent 
> access by multple JVMs and not threads.
> This improvement will provide solely a global locking sync context which will 
> work in *single* JVM. It is a non-goal to make it work with mulitple JVMs. A 
> downside of this solution is that is coarse, possible degregation of 
> performance for the sake of stability.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to