hboutemy commented on pull request #9: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-ear-plugin/pull/9#issuecomment-695923376
ok, now I get that the message is written by the archiver, not by the plugin adn from a pure theoretical perspective, a more dedicated archiver can help in some cases but given the plugin worked perfectly with simple jar, I need to clarify if any ear archiver feature won't conflict but sure, I'll rework the provided patch to fix the current conflict with master, if you don't beat me at it :) ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
