[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MENFORCER-360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17222674#comment-17222674
]
Zhenlei Huang commented on MENFORCER-360:
-----------------------------------------
[~guyv]
{quote}A (transitive) dependency on groupId:artifactId:1.0.0 and on
groupId:artifactId:2.0.0 means that we have a conflict.{quote}
, indeed.
What about a (transitive) dependency on groupId:artifactId:1.0.0 and on
groupId:artifactId:1.1.0 ?
> requireUpperBoundDeps should have option to check for same major version
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MENFORCER-360
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MENFORCER-360
> Project: Maven Enforcer Plugin
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Standard Rules
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0-M3
> Reporter: Guy Veraghtert
> Priority: Major
>
> In our project we use semantic versioning for our dependencies
> ([https://semver.org/|https://semver.org/).])
> The requireUpperBoundDeps rule already checks for compatible versions, but we
> would like to have the option to specify that no major (i.e. breaking)
> versions are mixed.
> So a (transitive) dependency on groupId:artifactId:1.0.0 and on
> groupId:artifactId:2.0.0 means that we have a conflict.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
