[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17446656#comment-17446656 ]
Tibor Digana commented on SUREFIRE-1954: ---------------------------------------- [~slawekjaranowski] Can you please rewrite the description? It does not match the reality of the implementation. We did not implement the option *failOnMultipleFrameworks*. > Fail on multiple test framework > ------------------------------- > > Key: SUREFIRE-1954 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1954 > Project: Maven Surefire > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Slawomir Jaranowski > Assignee: Tibor Digana > Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.0.0-M6 > > > When multiple test frameworks are present on project classpath surefire > chooses one framework for running test. > During automatically provider discover some of type test can be *skipped* > without any knowledge and information for developer. > It is danger situation than developer can add *second* test framework to > project and in the result some of test will be *skipped silently.* > We can force usage one or more needed providers by adding those to plugin > dependency and we can have control on executing test. > h3. Proposition > - add options {{failOnMultipleFrameworks}} *false* by default > h3. Scenario 1 - default > h4. when > - {{failOnMultipleFrameworks = *false*}} > - many tests framework on classpath > - no providers on plugin dependency > h4. then > - current behavior - choose first provider with warning about skipped elses > h3. Scenario 2 > h4. when > - {{failOnMultipleFrameworks = *true*}} > - many tests framework on classpath > - no providers on plugin dependency > h4. then > - fail plugin execution with reason > h3. Scenario 3 > h4. when > - many tests framework on classpath > - selected providers on plugin dependency > h4. then > - ignore {{failOnMultipleFrameworks}} > - use providers from dependency list, no warning -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.1#820001)