[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRELEASE-1073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17467703#comment-17467703
 ] 

Michael Osipov commented on MRELEASE-1073:
------------------------------------------

I don't see anything special is your diagram. Looks like a standard procedure 
to work. Maven will properly recognize well known qualifiers liek alpha, beta, 
etc. Additionally, Maven does not make a difference whether it is a GA version 
or a prerelease. It will increment properly. Moving from 1.0-beta-1-SNAPSHOT 
will move to 1.0-beta-1, then 1.0-beta-2-SNAPSHOT. At which point of the 
release process is missing what you need? Have you considered a custom versoin 
policy? We loosely support semantic versioning.

> Pre-Release generation
> ----------------------
>
>                 Key: MRELEASE-1073
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRELEASE-1073
>             Project: Maven Release Plugin
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Stéphane Passignat
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: waiting-for-feedback
>
>         Attachments: image-2022-01-02-21-57-38-405.png
>
>
> Before generating a final release, it's often required to publish several 
> kind of beta version. When one is validated, it's intended to become a pure 
> release.
> SCM aspect:
>  * create a tag 
>  * create a branch (option)
> Process impact:
>  * be able to generate a release from a tag or revision
>  * be able to generate a pre-release from a tag or revision
> Version number:
>  * the version is calculated looking at the scm tags (ex: 1.0-SNAPSHOT become 
> 1.0.beta14 if the tags matching the tag pattern have as higher number 
> 1.0.beta13)
>  
>  
> There are maybe some discussion about the version number. Should it be .beta 
> or -beta...
>  
> I think it would be great to have this feature in the release plugin, keeping 
> in one consistent tool all release facets.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

Reply via email to