cstamas commented on pull request #645: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/645#issuecomment-1004289256
> @cstamas What is your opinion on the package of this new solution? I don't have one yet. "handled transparently" is the key here. IMO, any validation should be next where model is, in Maven and not in Resolver, as with any other maven-specific models, Resolver have no clue about them (so resolver have no clue to parse XML into Metadata). Moreover, Resolver has no maven-specific bits, while Metadata is maven-specific bit, so IMHO it should NOT go into Resolver. OTOH, I'd -1 on "componentizing" maven-repository-metadata, as I'd keep same separation as with "model": -model, model-builder/validator etc. So, IMO maven-repository-metadata getting added components is wrong IMHO. Will check the rest a bit later. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
