[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rishabh Arora updated SUREFIRE-1984:
------------------------------------
Description:
I need this feature because some testcases need isolated environment to run. I
have seen that certain testcases fail on an existing fork but seem to run fine
on a new fork. I want to be able to keep the number of active forks same at all
times. Just that kill the fork that executes a failed testcase and retry on a
newly generated fork.
The idea in a nutshell:
----
{code:java}
import org.junit.Assert;
import org.junit.Test;
public class surefireTest {
private static boolean flag = true;
@Test
public void test1() {
Assert.assertTrue(flag);
flag = false;
}
@Test
public void test2() {
test1();
}
@Test
public void test3() {
test1();
}
}
{code}
----
Running the above code using surefire should ideally be able to pass all the
testcases, but in our case it is able to pass just testcase 1. Is it possible
to have a completely isolated environment (free from pollution from other
testcases) for all 3 testcases?
Please find the observed result attached below.
Thanks!
was:
I need this feature because some testcases need isolated environment to run. I
have seen that certain testcases fail on an existing fork but seem to run fine
on a new fork. I want to be able to keep the number of active forks same at all
times. Just that kill the fork that executes a failed testcase and retry on a
newly generated fork.
The idea in a nutshell:
----
{code:java}
import org.junit.Assert;
import org.junit.Test;
public class surefireTest {
private static boolean flag = true;
@Test
public void test1() throws InterruptedException {
Assert.assertTrue(flag);
flag = false;
}
@Test
public void test2() throws InterruptedException {
test1();
}
@Test
public void test3() throws InterruptedException {
test1();
}
}
{code}
----
Running the above code using surefire should ideally be able to pass all the
testcases, but in our case it is able to pass just testcase 1. Is it possible
to have a completely isolated environment (free from pollution from other
testcases) for all 3 testcases?
Please find the observed result attached below.
Thanks!
> To be able to kill a fork as soon as a test case fails and start a new fork
> from the failed testcase, following which subsequent testcases are run.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SUREFIRE-1984
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1984
> Project: Maven Surefire
> Issue Type: Wish
> Components: process forking
> Reporter: Rishabh Arora
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: Backlog
>
> Attachments: Screenshot 2022-01-25 at 10.36.34 AM.png
>
>
> I need this feature because some testcases need isolated environment to run.
> I have seen that certain testcases fail on an existing fork but seem to run
> fine on a new fork. I want to be able to keep the number of active forks same
> at all times. Just that kill the fork that executes a failed testcase and
> retry on a newly generated fork.
> The idea in a nutshell:
> ----
> {code:java}
> import org.junit.Assert;
> import org.junit.Test;
> public class surefireTest {
> private static boolean flag = true;
> @Test
> public void test1() {
> Assert.assertTrue(flag);
> flag = false;
> }
> @Test
> public void test2() {
> test1();
> }
> @Test
> public void test3() {
> test1();
> }
> }
> {code}
> ----
> Running the above code using surefire should ideally be able to pass all the
> testcases, but in our case it is able to pass just testcase 1. Is it possible
> to have a completely isolated environment (free from pollution from other
> testcases) for all 3 testcases?
> Please find the observed result attached below.
> Thanks!
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
