[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17495395#comment-17495395
]
Tibor Digana commented on SUREFIRE-2019:
----------------------------------------
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=maven-surefire.git;a=commit;h=e7fe0ddda6211babe39f565da739db3a86c89264
> ThreadedStreamConsumer - use Thread.join() instead of CountDownLatch.await()
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SUREFIRE-2019
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-2019
> Project: Maven Surefire
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Maven Failsafe Plugin, Maven Surefire Plugin, process
> forking
> Reporter: Tibor Digana
> Assignee: Tibor Digana
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.22.3, 3.0.0-M6
>
>
> Currently, {{ThreadedStreamConsumer}} uses {{CountDownLatch.await()}} which
> is not 100% reliable. The thread may die if it is in the waiting state during
> shutdown period. Let's use {{Thread.join()}} in the {{close()}}.
> Attention: do NOT use {{Thread.join()}} in the method {{handleEvent()}} - too
> slow, and therefore we use {{AtomicBoolean}} as a treatment.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
