[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MENFORCER-424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17558924#comment-17558924
]
Slawomir Jaranowski commented on MENFORCER-424:
-----------------------------------------------
One case when I use scope in {{dependencyManagement}} is when I want to change
scope for transitive dependency.
> Maven enforcer rule which checks that all dependencies in
> dependencyManagement don't have an explicit scope set
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MENFORCER-424
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MENFORCER-424
> Project: Maven Enforcer Plugin
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Standard Rules
> Reporter: Konrad Windszus
> Priority: Major
>
> Setting the scope in the dependencyManagement is an anti-pattern and may lead
> to surprising results during classpath creation. Compare also with the
> discussion in
> https://github.com/apache/maven-apache-parent/pull/63#discussion_r788361219.
> I propose to add a new rule with name {{banDependencyManagementScope}}.
> Probably scope {{import}} should be accepted though, because it is a special
> case.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)
