[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MBUILDCACHE-24?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17623452#comment-17623452
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on MBUILDCACHE-24:
-------------------------------------------
gnodet commented on code in PR #30:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/maven-build-cache-extension/pull/30#discussion_r1003827712
##########
src/main/java/org/apache/maven/buildcache/xml/CacheConfigImpl.java:
##########
@@ -604,7 +605,7 @@ public int getMaxLocalBuildsCached()
public String getLocalRepositoryLocation()
{
checkInitializedState();
- return getLocal().getLocation();
+ return System.getProperty( CACHE_LOCATION_PROPERTY_NAME,
getLocal().getLocation() );
Review Comment:
Shouldn't that be
```
return getProperty( CACHE_LOCATION_PROPERTY_NAME, getLocal().getLocation() );
```
##########
src/main/java/org/apache/maven/buildcache/LifecyclePhasesHelper.java:
##########
@@ -21,35 +21,95 @@
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Objects;
+import java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap;
+import java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentMap;
import java.util.stream.Collectors;
+import javax.annotation.Nonnull;
+import javax.annotation.PostConstruct;
import javax.inject.Inject;
import javax.inject.Named;
-import javax.inject.Singleton;
+import org.apache.maven.SessionScoped;
import org.apache.maven.buildcache.xml.Build;
+import org.apache.maven.execution.AbstractExecutionListener;
+import org.apache.maven.execution.ExecutionEvent;
+import org.apache.maven.execution.MavenExecutionRequest;
+import org.apache.maven.execution.MavenSession;
import org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycles;
import org.apache.maven.lifecycle.Lifecycle;
import org.apache.maven.plugin.MojoExecution;
+import org.apache.maven.project.MavenProject;
+import org.slf4j.Logger;
+import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;
-@Singleton
+@SessionScoped
@Named
-public class LifecyclePhasesHelper
+public class LifecyclePhasesHelper extends AbstractExecutionListener
{
+ private static final Logger LOGGER = LoggerFactory.getLogger(
LifecyclePhasesHelper.class );
+
+ private final MavenSession session;
private final DefaultLifecycles defaultLifecycles;
private final List<String> phases;
private final String lastCleanPhase;
+ private final ConcurrentMap<MavenProject, MojoExecution>
forkedProjectToOrigin = new ConcurrentHashMap<>();
+
@Inject
- public LifecyclePhasesHelper( DefaultLifecycles defaultLifecycles,
+ public LifecyclePhasesHelper( MavenSession session,
+ DefaultLifecycles defaultLifecycles,
@Named( "clean" ) Lifecycle cleanLifecycle )
{
+ this.session = session;
this.defaultLifecycles = Objects.requireNonNull( defaultLifecycles );
this.phases = defaultLifecycles.getLifeCycles().stream()
.flatMap( lf -> lf.getPhases().stream() )
.collect( Collectors.toList() );
this.lastCleanPhase = CacheUtils.getLast( cleanLifecycle.getPhases() );
}
+ @PostConstruct
+ public void init()
+ {
+ MavenExecutionRequest request = session.getRequest();
+ ChainedListener lifecycleListener = new ChainedListener(
request.getExecutionListener() );
+ lifecycleListener.chainListener( this );
+ request.setExecutionListener( lifecycleListener );
Review Comment:
So that's the workaround for not being to extend `EventSpy` from within the
`SessionScope`, right ?
> Cache cannot be processed in presence of forked executions
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MBUILDCACHE-24
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MBUILDCACHE-24
> Project: Maven Build Cache Extension
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Alexander Ashitkin
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
>
> Current implementation relies on lifecycle phases presence in
> `MojoExecution`. In case of forked execution
> `MojoExecution#getLifecyclePhase` could return null which result in IAEs in
> multiples places in cache:
>
> {code:java}
> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Unsupported phase: null
> at org.apache.maven.buildcache.LifecyclePhasesHelper.isLaterPhase
> (LifecyclePhasesHelper.java:121)
> at
> org.apache.maven.buildcache.LifecyclePhasesHelper.isLaterPhaseThanClean
> (LifecyclePhasesHelper.java:105)
> at org.apache.maven.buildcache.LifecyclePhasesHelper.getCleanSegment
> (LifecyclePhasesHelper.java:139)
> at org.apache.maven.buildcache.BuildCacheMojosExecutionStrategy.execute
> (BuildCacheMojosExecutionStrategy.java:101)
> at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.MojoExecutor.execute
> (MojoExecutor.java:153)
> at
> org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.MojoExecutor.executeForkedExecutions
> (MojoExecutor.java:366)
> at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.MojoExecutor.execute
> (MojoExecutor.java:211)
> at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.MojoExecutor.execute
> (MojoExecutor.java:167)
> at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.MojoExecutor.access$000
> (MojoExecutor.java:66)
> at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.MojoExecutor$1.run
> (MojoExecutor.java:158)
> at org.apache.maven.buildcache.BuildCacheMojosExecutionStrategy.execute
> (BuildCacheMojosExecutionStrategy.java:127)
> at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.MojoExecutor.execute
> (MojoExecutor.java:153)
> at
> org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.LifecycleModuleBuilder.buildProject
> (LifecycleModuleBuilder.java:117)
> at
> org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.builder.multithreaded.MultiThreadedBuilder$1.call
> (MultiThreadedBuilder.java:196)
> at
> org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.builder.multithreaded.MultiThreadedBuilder$1.call
> (MultiThreadedBuilder.java:186)
> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run (FutureTask.java:266)
> at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call
> (Executors.java:511)
> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run (FutureTask.java:266)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker
> (ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run
> (ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
>
> {code}
> Proposed fix is to resolve `lifecyclePhase` from the originating mojo and use
> it as a lifecycle phase for forked mojos.
> Optionally, the issue probably could be resolved in maven-core by properly
> setting execution phase.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)