michael-o commented on PR #126: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-doxia/pull/126#issuecomment-1297241475
> Looks good @michael-o ! However, how future proof is this approach? As you mentioned, there aren't a ton of people able to maintain Doxia any more and I'm a bit worried about all these specific tag lists in the code. Say 5 years from now they invent a `<vr>` tag for Virtual Reality... will that now blow up the logs with warnings if we use that in our site? I do understand your concerns and you are right. While I cannot look into the future, I have talked already about Doxia 3 with @hboutemy and Doxia 3 will likely complete drop the parser/sink approach it will be a thin layer about FlexMark/Asciidoctor maybe with JBake. I don't like Doxia's current complexity and it isn't as useful as we it was be 10 or 15 years ago. We don't need a Swiss Army knife yet another Pandoc anymore. The current target of Doxia 2 is to drop luggage and remove workarounds. Also consider that I am the only one maintaining Doxia for the last couple of years... -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
