[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17675709#comment-17675709
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on MRESOLVER-298:
------------------------------------------
cstamas commented on PR #235:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-resolver/pull/235#issuecomment-1379447874
> Call me stupid, but what makes it optional now? That the providers don't
appear in the annoations and this avoids the transitive dep to `javax.inject`?
No dependency or dep scope was changed, it was code, here
https://github.com/apache/maven-resolver/pull/235/files#diff-530cadfdf6c10eff31703c1c50c7121f9c72c64a4f55c156428c7cc1113e6950R77-R86
This `private static` method is used with default ctor (when SL is used) and
expected Provider on classpath. This is not the case anymore.
Simple proof: the "demo snippets" now work from IDE (they have main method),
before this change, on current master they do NOT work due same issue (as
javax.inject is only in test scope).
> javax.inject should not be provided or optional
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MRESOLVER-298
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-298
> Project: Maven Resolver
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Olivier Lamy
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.10.0
>
>
> Using resolver in a non DI context and got this exception
> {code}
> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javax/inject/Provider
> at
> org.eclipse.aether.internal.impl.synccontext.named.NamedLockFactoryAdapterFactoryImpl.getManuallyCreatedNameMappers(NamedLockFactoryAdapterFactoryImpl.java:85)
> at
> org.eclipse.aether.internal.impl.synccontext.named.NamedLockFactoryAdapterFactoryImpl.<init>(NamedLockFactoryAdapterFactoryImpl.java:117)
> at
> jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor26.newInstance(Unknown
> Source)
> {code}
> This is because javax.inject is declared as provided and/or optional whereas
> it's not.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
