elharo commented on code in PR #148:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/maven-assembly-plugin/pull/148#discussion_r1255699674


##########
src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/assembly/AssemblerConfigurationSource.java:
##########
@@ -223,4 +223,12 @@ public interface AssemblerConfigurationSource {
      * @return Override group name.
      */
     String getOverrideGroupName();
+
+    /**
+     * @return mask which is applied to permissions of files/directories 
before they are put into assembly.
+     * If {@code null} then the mask is not explicitly configured and remains 
implementation-specific.

Review Comment:
   Is it really implementation specific? Not just that there simply isn't a 
mask? How many implementations are there?



##########
src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/assembly/mojos/AbstractAssemblyMojo.java:
##########
@@ -430,6 +430,15 @@ public abstract class AbstractAssemblyMojo extends 
AbstractMojo implements Assem
     @Parameter
     private String overrideGroupName;
 
+    /**
+     * Override of mask which is applied to permissions of files/directories 
before they are put into assembly.
+     * If {@code null} then the mask is not explicitly configured and remains 
implementation-specific.
+     * If invalid value is specified - like negative value - then behaviour is 
implementation specific, i.e. depends

Review Comment:
   an invalid value
   such as a negative value
   the behavior
   That is, it depends on the underlying
   of assembly --> the assembly



##########
src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/assembly/mojos/AbstractAssemblyMojo.java:
##########
@@ -430,6 +430,15 @@ public abstract class AbstractAssemblyMojo extends 
AbstractMojo implements Assem
     @Parameter
     private String overrideGroupName;
 
+    /**
+     * Override of mask which is applied to permissions of files/directories 
before they are put into assembly.
+     * If {@code null} then the mask is not explicitly configured and remains 
implementation-specific.
+     * If invalid value is specified - like negative value - then behaviour is 
implementation specific, i.e. depends
+     * on underlying library which is used for building of assembly.
+     */
+    @Parameter
+    private Integer overrideUmask;

Review Comment:
   Does this actually override a umask or does it set a umask? In the other 
cases above — GID, username — these are set on the files and may vary from one 
file to the next.  umask, however, is not a per-file property. It's applied to 
the permissions of the file (which is a per-file property)



##########
src/it/projects/bugs/massembly-791/pom.xml:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
+<!--
+Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+distributed with this work for additional information
+regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+"License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+
+  http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+
+Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+"AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+specific language governing permissions and limitations
+under the License.
+-->
+<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0";
+         xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
+         xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 
http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd";>
+  <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
+  <parent>
+    <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugin.assembly.test</groupId>
+    <artifactId>it-project-parent</artifactId>
+    <version>1</version>
+  </parent>
+
+  <groupId>org.apache.maven.its</groupId>
+  <artifactId>massembly-791</artifactId>
+  <packaging>pom</packaging>
+  <version>1.0</version>
+
+  <properties>
+    
<project.build.outputTimestamp>2023-06-07T10:18:31Z</project.build.outputTimestamp>

Review Comment:
   Additional public API is too heavyweight a solution to work is too 
heavyweight a solution for a bug that can be fixed at the source.



##########
src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/assembly/AssemblerConfigurationSource.java:
##########
@@ -223,4 +223,12 @@ public interface AssemblerConfigurationSource {
      * @return Override group name.
      */
     String getOverrideGroupName();
+
+    /**
+     * @return mask which is applied to permissions of files/directories 
before they are put into assembly.

Review Comment:
   the assembly



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to