[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-682?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17789863#comment-17789863
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on MJAVADOC-682:
-----------------------------------------

michael-o opened a new pull request, #253:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-javadoc-plugin/pull/253

   …oupId:artifactId, but different versions
   
   Following this checklist to help us incorporate your
   contribution quickly and easily:
   
    - [ ] Make sure there is a [JIRA 
issue](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC) filed
          for the change (usually before you start working on it).  Trivial 
changes like typos do not
          require a JIRA issue.  Your pull request should address just this 
issue, without
          pulling in other changes.
    - [ ] Each commit in the pull request should have a meaningful subject line 
and body.
    - [ ] Format the pull request title like `[MJAVADOC-XXX] - Fixes bug in 
ApproximateQuantiles`,
          where you replace `MJAVADOC-XXX` with the appropriate JIRA issue. 
Best practice
          is to use the JIRA issue title in the pull request title and in the 
first line of the
          commit message.
    - [ ] Write a pull request description that is detailed enough to 
understand what the pull request does, how, and why.
    - [ ] Run `mvn clean verify -Prun-its` to make sure basic checks pass. A 
more thorough check will
          be performed on your pull request automatically.
   
   If your pull request is about ~20 lines of code you don't need to sign an
   [Individual Contributor License 
Agreement](https://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.pdf) if you are unsure
   please ask on the developers list.
   
   To make clear that you license your contribution under
   the [Apache License Version 2.0, January 
2004](http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)
   you have to acknowledge this by using the following check-box.
   
    - [ ] I hereby declare this contribution to be licensed under the [Apache 
License Version 2.0, January 2004](http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)
   
    - [ ] In any other case, please file an [Apache Individual Contributor 
License Agreement](https://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.pdf).
   
   




> Reactor builds fail when multiple modules with same groupId:artifactId, but 
> different versions
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MJAVADOC-682
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-682
>             Project: Maven Javadoc Plugin
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: jar, javadoc
>    Affects Versions: 3.1.0, 3.1.1, 3.2.0, 3.3.0, 3.3.1, 3.3.2, 3.4.0, 3.4.1, 
> 3.5.0, 3.6.0, 3.6.2
>         Environment: Debian Linux versions 10.10 through 12.2
> OpenJDK 64-bit versions 11.0.11 through 17.0.9
> Maven versions 3.8.1 through 3.9.5
>            Reporter: AO Industries, Inc.
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: jpms
>
> In versions 3.1.0 through 3.6.2, when a reactor build has multiple projects 
> with the same groupId and artifactId, even when different versions, the 
> javadoc fails with:
> Exit code: 1 - error: module not found: com.aoindustries.example
> Plugin 3.0.1 works.
> We have created a minimal example project that demonstrates this bug:
> [https://github.com/aoindustries/maven-javadoc-plugin-failing-multiple-projects-same-name]
>  
> — Copy from demo project README.md —
> h2. To Reproduce:
>  # Clone this project: {{git clone 
> [https://github.com/aoindustries/maven-javadoc-plugin-failing-multiple-projects-same-name.git]}}
>  # Change to project directory: {{cd 
> maven-javadoc-plugin-failing-multiple-projects-same-name}}
>  # Perform build to see error in {{jar}} goal: {{mvn verify}}
>  # Also fails with {{javadoc}} goal: {{mvn clean compile javadoc:javadoc}}
> h2. Notes:
>  * Can build individual modules directly, such as {{(cd module-1 && mvn 
> verify)}}
>  * Reverting to maven-javadoc-plugin version 3.0.1 makes it work
>  * Changing the groupId or artifactId in either module-1 or module-2 makes it 
> work.
>  * Changing module names, package names, or class names in modules has no 
> effect.
>  * We believe this to be distinct from [Issue 
> #673|https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MJAVADOC/issues/MJAVADOC-673]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to