[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MENFORCER-506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17911106#comment-17911106
]
Elliotte Rusty Harold commented on MENFORCER-506:
-------------------------------------------------
Who owns extra-enforcer-rules? Is there a corresponding bug to remove it from
that project? I'm OK with moving it into core. I do prefer not having it in two
places though.
> Move EnforceBytecodeVersion rule from extra-rules
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MENFORCER-506
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MENFORCER-506
> Project: Maven Enforcer Plugin
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Standard Rules
> Reporter: Tamas Cservenak
> Priority: Major
>
> In 99% of cases users (and we as for that matter) need to "pull in" enforcer
> "extra rules" to use this single rule. This rule (as I see) has no extra
> dependency requirement.
> It would make sense to pull in this rule from "extra rules" as that would
> simplify many lives out there (and ourselves as well).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
