[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCM-230?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17964310#comment-17964310
]
Olivier Lamy commented on SCM-230:
----------------------------------
This project has moved from Jira to GitHub Issues. This issue was migrated to
[apache/maven-scm#425|https://github.com/apache/maven-scm/issues/425].
> mercurial plugin
> ----------------
>
> Key: SCM-230
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCM-230
> Project: Maven SCM (Moved to GitHub Issues)
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: maven-scm-provider-mercurial (hg)
> Reporter: solo turn
> Assignee: Emmanuel Venisse
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.0-rc1
>
> Attachments: maven-scm-hg.tar.gz, maven-scm-provider-hg-0.09.tbz,
> maven-scm-provider-hg-0.8.tbz, maven-scm-provider-hg-0.8.tbz,
> maven-scm-provider-hg-0.8.tbz, maven-scm-provider-hg-1.0-SNAPSHOT.tar.gz,
> maven-scm-provider-hg.diff.gz, maven-scm-provider-hg.tar.gz,
> maven-scm-provider-hg.tgz, scm-230-patch-1.svndiff, site-patch, site-patch-2
>
>
> it would be nice to have a mercurial source provider. and if not, it would be
> nice to update the documentation on http://maven.apache.org/scm/ so that
> anybody could just copy the bzr provider and make a mercurial provider out of
> it. it should be nearly the same implementation.
> mercurial is (currently) much faster than bzr and therefor really useable.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
