[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCM-671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17964862#comment-17964862
 ] 

Olivier Lamy commented on SCM-671:
----------------------------------

This project has moved from Jira to GitHub Issues. This issue was migrated to 
[apache/maven-scm#876|https://github.com/apache/maven-scm/issues/876]. 

> Perforce provider Edit command incorrectly ignores working Directory
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SCM-671
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCM-671
>             Project: Maven SCM (Moved to GitHub Issues)
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: maven-scm-provider-perforce
>    Affects Versions: 1.6
>         Environment: maven 3.0.3
>            Reporter: dwalling
>            Assignee: Olivier Lamy
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.7
>
>         Attachments: PerforceEditCommandTest.java, patch
>
>
> When the working directory is something other than "." the perforce edit 
> command does not include the relative path to the files actually being 
> edited. For instance in the case where the directory structure is:
> pom.xml
> a/pom.xml
> a/foo.xml
> The command 
> mvn scm:edit -f a/pom.xml -Dincludes=foo.xml
> will result in a failure because the method 
> PerforceEditCommand.createCommandLine is assembling the path as if foo/.xml 
> were at the top level.
>  
> A second instance is the case where the directory structure is:
> pom.xml
> a/pom.xml
> a/b/pom.xml
> a/b/c/pom.xml
> The command 
> mvn scm:edit -f a/pom.xml -Dincludes=**/pom.xml
> will result in only the top-level pom.xml being opened for editing, when it 
> should open b/pom.xml and b/c/pom.xml



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to