[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MWAR-240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=240516#action_240516
]
Dennis Lundberg commented on MWAR-240:
--------------------------------------
Can you please put together a small test project that we can use to test this
issue?
> archiveClasses and attachClasses in 2.1
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: MWAR-240
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MWAR-240
> Project: Maven 2.x WAR Plugin
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.1
> Environment: Apache Maven 2.2.1 (r801777; 2009-08-06 21:16:01+0200)
> Java version: 1.6.0_18
> Default locale: de_DE, platform encoding: Cp1252
> OS name: "windows 7" version: "6.1" arch: "amd64" Family: "windows"
> Reporter: Sergiy Shyrkov
>
> There seems to be a regression between 2.1-beta-1 and 2.1 with regard to
> archiveClasses and attachClasses options.
> My use case:
> I have a WAR project with Java classes and I am setting both archiveClasses
> and attachClasses to true.
> With 2.1-beta-1 it was working correctly (mvn clean install) --> I got
> classes packaged into a JAR and placed into WEB-INF/lib and I got that JAR
> artifact deployed to my Maven repository.
> Just upgraded to 2.1 and I got the following with the same use case: I got
> classes packaged into a JAR and placed into WEB-INF/lib (correct) and I got
> an empty JAR artifact (only META-INF/ present) deployed to my Maven
> repository (incorrect).
> Looking at the code in 2.1 of WarMojo (line 230) I am seeing that the classes
> folder (for classes to be included into attached artifact) is empty, because
> it was cleared before due to archiveClasses=true
> Trying to debug both code branches I am seeing a difference between
> 2.1-beta-1 and 2.1 in that the
> getJarArchiver().getDirs() before the call to packager.packageClasses()
> method (line 233/234)
> is empty in the 2.1:
> (java.util.HashMap<K,V>) {}
> whereas it is not in 2.1-beta-1. It contains a list of all my classes,
> perhaps because the same archiver instance was used to package them into JAR
> for WEB-INF/lib.
> That is why I am getting all my classes in the attached artifact with
> 2.1-beta-1
> I would really need your help in understanding the "correct" behaviour.
> Is this a regression bug for 2.1 or I am completely wrong in my expectations
> about archiveClasses and attachClasses used together?
> Kind regards
> Sergiy Shyrkov
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
