[ 
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Herve Boutemy updated MNG-3244:
-------------------------------

    Description: 
Here is the test case to reroduce this problem.  Take the following two pom.xml 
files

{code:xml}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<project>
        <groupId>org.bar</groupId>
        <artifactId>foo</artifactId>
        <name>foo</name>
        <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
        <packaging>pom</packaging>
        <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>

        <distributionManagement>
                <site>
                        <id>foo-site</id>
                        <url>file://C:/Documents and 
Settings/foo/.m2/site/${project.artifactId}</url>
                </site>
        </distributionManagement>
</project>

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<project>
        <groupId>org.bar</groupId>
        <artifactId>baz</artifactId>
        <name>baz</name>
        <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
        <packaging>pom</packaging>
        <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>

        <parent>
                <artifactId>foo</artifactId>
                <groupId>org.bar</groupId>
                <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
        </parent>
</project>{code}

And run the site-deploy goal on each.  What you get under the site directory is 
this

- site
/- foo
---/site docs
/- baz
---/- baz (extra directory)
--- ---/site docs

This is the simplest test case.  In the case where I have a "grandparent" pom, 
the site directory uses the grandparent/parent as the path to the site, and 
doesn't use the actual artifactId of the artifact I'm creating the site for.

  was:
Here is the test case to reroduce this problem.  Take the following two pom.xml 
files

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<project>
        <groupId>org.bar</groupId>
        <artifactId>foo</artifactId>
        <name>foo</name>
        <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
        <packaging>pom</packaging>
        <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>

        <distributionManagement>
                <site>
                        <id>foo-site</id>
                        <url>file://C:/Documents and 
Settings/foo/.m2/site/${project.artifactId}</url>
                </site>
        </distributionManagement>
</project>

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<project>
        <groupId>org.bar</groupId>
        <artifactId>baz</artifactId>
        <name>baz</name>
        <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
        <packaging>pom</packaging>
        <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>

        <parent>
                <artifactId>foo</artifactId>
                <groupId>org.bar</groupId>
                <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
        </parent>
</project>

And run the site-deploy goal on each.  What you get under the site directory is 
this

- site
/- foo
---/site docs
/- baz
---/- baz (extra directory)
--- ---/site docs

This is the simplest test case.  In the case where I have a "grandparent" pom, 
the site directory uses the grandparent/parent as the path to the site, and 
doesn't use the actual artifactId of the artifact I'm creating the site for.


> inherited site url not properly handling parameters
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MNG-3244
>                 URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3244
>             Project: Maven 2 & 3
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Inheritance and Interpolation, Sites & Reporting
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.7
>            Reporter: Jacob Robertson
>            Assignee: Brian Fox
>             Fix For: Issues to be reviewed for 3.x
>
>         Attachments: fix-inherited-site-url.patch, guide-site.patch, 
> mng-3244_patch.txt
>
>
> Here is the test case to reroduce this problem.  Take the following two 
> pom.xml files
> {code:xml}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <project>
>       <groupId>org.bar</groupId>
>       <artifactId>foo</artifactId>
>       <name>foo</name>
>       <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
>       <packaging>pom</packaging>
>       <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
>       <distributionManagement>
>               <site>
>                       <id>foo-site</id>
>                       <url>file://C:/Documents and 
> Settings/foo/.m2/site/${project.artifactId}</url>
>               </site>
>       </distributionManagement>
> </project>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <project>
>       <groupId>org.bar</groupId>
>       <artifactId>baz</artifactId>
>       <name>baz</name>
>       <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
>       <packaging>pom</packaging>
>       <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
>       <parent>
>               <artifactId>foo</artifactId>
>               <groupId>org.bar</groupId>
>               <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
>       </parent>
> </project>{code}
> And run the site-deploy goal on each.  What you get under the site directory 
> is this
> - site
> /- foo
> ---/site docs
> /- baz
> ---/- baz (extra directory)
> --- ---/site docs
> This is the simplest test case.  In the case where I have a "grandparent" 
> pom, the site directory uses the grandparent/parent as the path to the site, 
> and doesn't use the actual artifactId of the artifact I'm creating the site 
> for.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to