[ 
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=283419#comment-283419
 ] 

Kristian Rosenvold commented on SUREFIRE-790:
---------------------------------------------

It also sounds like you should be writing a "arquillian-maven-plugin" that does 
the ShrinkWrapping,  artifact resolution and project modification /prior/ to 
invoking surefire in a regular fork.

Generalized access to the "session" within the forked process is just /not/ 
going to happen if I understand anything at all; something aether specific 
*maybe*. The fork is designed to stay minimalistic and "clean" and this 
suggestion certainly breaks that constraint totally. 

> Allow forked process to access the Maven session of parent
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SUREFIRE-790
>                 URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-790
>             Project: Maven Surefire
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: process forking
>    Affects Versions: 2.10
>            Reporter: Karel Piwko
>
> Forked process should be able to get information from a "parent process", 
> which is a Maven build execution.
> This will allow the test to access information like which pom.xml file being 
> processed, settings.xml and Maven Reactor plugin. 
> This feature is needed to any test which want to interfere with Maven 
> repositories with Aether, for instance.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to