[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Adam B updated MESOS-1630:
--------------------------

    Description: 
If a framework gets removed, for example, because it unregisters with the 
master (i.e., due to MESOS-1550), but then the same framework ID is reused when 
a framework re-registers (which we currently allow) then we should remove the 
framework from Master::frameworks.completed otherwise when a slave re-registers 
then in Master::reconcile we'll notice that the slave is running tasks from a 
"completed" framework and tell the slave to shutdown that framework, thus 
shutting down all of the tasks.

This should be easily fixed by removing the framework from frameworks.completed 
when a framework re-registers with the same ID as a completed framework. 

  was:
If a framework gets removed, for example, because it unregisters with the 
master (i.e., due to MESOS-1550), but then the same framework ID is reused when 
a framework re-registers (which we currently allow) then we should remove the 
framework from Master::frameworks.completed otherwise when a slave re-registers 
then in Master::reconcile we'll notice that the slave is running tasks from a 
"completed" framework and tell the slave to shutdown that framework, thus 
shutting down all of the tasks.

This should be easily fixed by removing the framework from completedFrameworks 
when a framework re-registers with the same ID as a completed framework. 


> Remove framework from completedFrameworks if framework re-registers.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MESOS-1630
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1630
>             Project: Mesos
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: master
>    Affects Versions: 0.14.0, 0.14.1, 0.14.2, 0.17.0, 0.16.0, 0.15.0, 0.18.0, 
> 0.18.1, 0.18.2, 0.19.0, 0.19.1
>            Reporter: Benjamin Hindman
>            Assignee: Bernd Mathiske
>            Priority: Critical
>
> If a framework gets removed, for example, because it unregisters with the 
> master (i.e., due to MESOS-1550), but then the same framework ID is reused 
> when a framework re-registers (which we currently allow) then we should 
> remove the framework from Master::frameworks.completed otherwise when a slave 
> re-registers then in Master::reconcile we'll notice that the slave is running 
> tasks from a "completed" framework and tell the slave to shutdown that 
> framework, thus shutting down all of the tasks.
> This should be easily fixed by removing the framework from 
> frameworks.completed when a framework re-registers with the same ID as a 
> completed framework. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to