[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14284648#comment-14284648 ]
Kapil Arya commented on MESOS-2211: ----------------------------------- I have created a RR for updating the style guide to reflect our usage of `#pragma once` instead of `#define` guard for our header files: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30100/ This is also meant to get a consensus on the proposal. > Include guard naming fixup > -------------------------- > > Key: MESOS-2211 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2211 > Project: Mesos > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Till Toenshoff > Assignee: Kapil Arya > Priority: Trivial > Labels: newbie > > Triggered by a comment in a review request, I noticed that we currently have > no consistent style for naming include guards. > Examples: > include/mesos/resources.hpp: {{#define __RESOURCES_HPP__}} > include/mesos/executor.hpp: {{#define __MESOS_EXECUTOR_HPP__}} > include/mesos/mesos.hpp: {{#define __MESOS_HPP__}} > I think the **right** way would be stating the path and include file name > within the guard, so the above at fault become: > include/mesos/resources.hpp: {{#define __MESOS_RESOURCES_HPP__}} > include/mesos/mesos.hpp: {{#define __MESOS_MESOS_HPP__}} > Everything from include/XXX should have a __XXX_ prefix in its guard name, > anything from src/XXX should have a __XXX_ prefix. This should also apply to > multiple folder levels; e.g. include/XXX/YYY/FOO should have a __XXX_YYY_FOO > prefix. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)