[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2587?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595313#comment-14595313
 ] 

Tyson Norris commented on MESOS-2587:
-------------------------------------

We see a simliar problem with slaves, where slave MESOS_HOSTNAME is either 
reachable by master (using private IP), or else the browser UI works (using 
public IP) - but we cannot make both work properly at the same time. Generally 
anywhere that HOSTNAME or IP is configurable, this should ideally include a 
public and a private value, for networks that expose different values depending 
on the actual client.

> libprocess should allow configuration of ip/port separate from the ones it 
> binds to
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MESOS-2587
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2587
>             Project: Mesos
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: libprocess
>            Reporter: Cosmin Lehene
>
> Currently libprocess will advertise {{LIBPROCESS_IP}}{{LIBPROCESS_PORT}}, but 
> if a framework runs in a container without an an interface that has a 
> publicly accessible IP (e.g. a container in bridge mode) it will advertise an 
> IP that will not be reachable by master.
> With this, we could advertise the external IP (reachable from master) of the 
> bridge from within a container. 
> This should allow frameworks running in containers to work in the safer 
> bridged mode.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to