[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1457?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14617296#comment-14617296
]
Till Toenshoff commented on MESOS-1457:
---------------------------------------
I got pointed to this older issue as the patches did not get committed.
Seems Palak's solution is acceptable. It would be great if we could indeed get
a comment into the ProcessBase constructor stating something like the proposed
{noformat}
// Please provide a process ID prefix to ease debugging (See MESOS-1457).
{noformat}
[~PalakPC] could you possibly propose the above in a review-request and rebase
those other two patches so we can get them committed?
> Process IDs should be required to be human-readable
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MESOS-1457
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1457
> Project: Mesos
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: libprocess
> Reporter: Dominic Hamon
> Assignee: Palak Choudhary
> Priority: Minor
>
> When debugging, it's very useful to understand which processes are getting
> timeslices. As such, the human-readable names that can be passed to
> {{ProcessBase}} are incredibly valuable, however they are currently optional.
> If the constructor of {{ProcessBase}} took a mandatory string, every process
> would get a human-readable name and debugging would be much easier.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
