[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14662312#comment-14662312
]
gyliu commented on MESOS-3075:
------------------------------
Seems duplicate. Also I think that SUPPRESS offer might be a better name
compared with Quiesce Offer.
> introduce QuiesceOffers message
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: MESOS-3075
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3075
> Project: Mesos
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: James Peach
> Attachments: MESOS-3075.tiff
>
>
> When there are a large number of slaves and a large number of frameworks,
> allocation performance suffers as the list of refused filters grows. Once a
> framework hits its target, it ends up having to refused offers all the time.
> It is more effective to simply request that it no longer receive offers.
> The QuiesceOffers message requests that the framework no longer receive
> offers. It has similar semantics to declining an offer. The quiescence is
> persisted across framework failures, and can be lifted using ReviveOffers.
> The proposed protobuf signature for this is:
> {code}
> diff --git a/src/messages/messages.proto b/src/messages/messages.proto
> index 165a16d..1b4475a 100644
> --- a/src/messages/messages.proto
> +++ b/src/messages/messages.proto
> @@ -188,6 +188,10 @@ message ReviveOffersMessage {
> required FrameworkID framework_id = 1;
> }
> +message QuiesceOffersMessage {
> + required FrameworkID framework_id = 1;
> + optional double quiesce_seconds = 2;
> +}
> {code}
> If {{quiesce_seconds}} is not specified, the quiescence is indefinite (ie.
> applied until the next ReviveOffers).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
