[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Neil Conway updated MESOS-3920:
-------------------------------
    Description: 
Right now, the "reserve" and "unreserve" endpoints work as follows:

1. slaveID and resources are sent as two separate key-value pairs in the body 
of the request, which is URL-encoded ({{application/x-www-form-urlencoded}} 
media type).
2. resources is itself a JSON document.

This is a bit weird: it would more idiomatic to send a single JSON document 
(using content-type {{application/json}}) with the required information. [ 
Updated: the initial bug description claimed that slaveID and resources were 
sent as query parameters, but that is incorrect. ]

Obviously, there are some backward compatibility concerns if we want to change 
this.

  was:
Right now, the "reserve" and "unreserve" endpoints work as follows:

1. slaveID and resources are sent as two separate key-value pairs in the body 
of the request, which is URL-encoded ({{application/x-www-form-urlencoded}} 
media type).
2. resources is itself a JSON document.

This is a bit weird: it would more idiomatic to send a single JSON document 
(using content-type {{application/json}}) with the required information.

Obviously, there are some backward compatibility concerns if we want to change 
this.


> Considering changing /reserve, /unreserve endpoint syntax
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MESOS-3920
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3920
>             Project: Mesos
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Neil Conway
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: http, mesosphere, reservations
>
> Right now, the "reserve" and "unreserve" endpoints work as follows:
> 1. slaveID and resources are sent as two separate key-value pairs in the body 
> of the request, which is URL-encoded ({{application/x-www-form-urlencoded}} 
> media type).
> 2. resources is itself a JSON document.
> This is a bit weird: it would more idiomatic to send a single JSON document 
> (using content-type {{application/json}}) with the required information. [ 
> Updated: the initial bug description claimed that slaveID and resources were 
> sent as query parameters, but that is incorrect. ]
> Obviously, there are some backward compatibility concerns if we want to 
> change this.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to