[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15041484#comment-15041484
]
Alexander Rukletsov commented on MESOS-3965:
--------------------------------------------
Why not use validation for {{QuotaInfo}} instead? Or do you mean we should
leverage existing {{internal::master::quota::validation::quotaInfo()}} to
ensure {{Quota.QuotaInfo}} is always valid?
> Ensure resources in `QuotaInfo` protobuf do not contain `role`
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MESOS-3965
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3965
> Project: Mesos
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: master
> Reporter: Alexander Rukletsov
> Assignee: Alexander Rukletsov
> Labels: mesosphere
>
> {{QuotaInfo}} protobuf currently stores per-role quotas, including
> {{Resource}} objects. These resources are neither statically nor dynamically
> reserved, hence they may not contain {{role}} field. We should ensure this
> field is unset, as well as update validation routine for {{QuotaInfo}}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
